It may well be true that I don’t manage my time as effectively as I should, but I am struggling to keep up with everything I should be doing, as well as things I would like to be reporting here on the site.
A couple of new points to report very briefly -
- I have not heard back from Sarah Milov from the Harvard Crimson.
- I have heard back from Prof. Ron Numbers from the University of Wisconsin about his comments in the NY Times. His response was to point out that the ID movement’s stated goal is to overthrow methodological naturalism. I think this is a fair comment, and reflects a failure on the part of some ID proponents to use appropriate precision in their public statements.
- I have made some comments of William Dembski’s blog in response to someone who argued that the logic behind ID should lead to the conclusion that the specified complexity in living organism was produced by an embodied intelligent agent. My comment is #7 here.
BTW, 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit when I got up this morning. You do the math. That’s cold man, and without wind chill!